MTG Cardsmith Community Forums
MemoryHead
About
- Username
- MemoryHead
- Joined
- Visits
- 5,188
- Last Active
- Roles
- Member
Comments
-
@sorinjace The author's note given by Beeswax in relation to the mechanic was "This ability is always paired with a clause that counts creatures of the relevant type." I'm pretty sure the mechanic was originally designed to have an ETB (or on-resolv…
-
Ascension by @Mellenius. The version of the mechanic that I'm using has been edited slightly in order to make the token a Dragon (the original concept for the mechanic made the token an Angel).
-
-
@RayearthIX Re-copied the image over so it should work now.
-
I'm genuinely a little amazed that nobody so far has made something that transforms and that everybody so far has made a legendary creature their focus, so here goes nothing: Edit: Fixed Foulmoon Fallen's flavor text.
-
@Ranshi922 I count eleven cards (excluding the Dr. Mario card that probably doesn't count / I have no idea of the purpose of).
-
Horrors? *Sigh* Tell Kosho that we might have need of the talents of his house after all. After all, the best remedy to one type of monstrosity is surely another, and Kosho has plenty to choose from:
-
@ThePhantomJoker I'll take my likes on anything I've made recently-ish that seems good to you. That or wait for stuff in the future if you don't think any of my current works are any good.
-
@Tommia It still seems like too much of a situational hate mechanic that warps the set's design. Do you put in lots of creatures with that kind of evasion to make it more effective and therefore make factions without it suffer in limited formats, or…
-
Well, here goes nothing:
-
@Lujikul @dadderd I saw somebody doing level up cards on here a few days ago (wish I could remember who, but I can't and I don't think it was a major cardsmith). The formatting wasn't perfect, obviously, but they were using dropdowns and spacing to …
-
Considering that I don't trust myself not to forget this contest exists, I've got something simplistic that I made a while ago (and still need to port onto Cardsmith, come to think of it). The basis of its story is more of a story explanation for a …
-
@HeroKP Wait, so are all of those cards from other people? I certainly recognise one as being mine...
-
@HeroKP Ok, so that means mechanics and what each of the factions vaguely do, right (for example "Izzet is artificers, spellslinging and goblins")?
-
@sorinjace I'm game, sign me up.
-
@HeroKP Ooh, graphic-y things. I'd like it.
-
@The-DM Conspiracies were cards made specifically for drafting in the Conspiracy sets (which were made primarily for drafting). They existed in the command zone (so they couldn't be interacted with in any way) and imparted positive effects on their …
-
@HeroKP It's occured to me that I probably should have said this a while ago, but basing effects off of mana colors spent (thinking of the 1-drop cycle) is formatted like I've done it on my Savagery's Servant card. You use the actual mana symbols. M…
-
@Derain2 I've personally got a suspicion that all of the goblin leaders are going to see a redesign once more of the set is done to fit in terms of balance and changing faction ideals. On a more direct note then yeah, Inkri is completely busted.
-
@HeroKP Assuming that you mean the concept of permanent ideas, it's because they're a pain to represent, especially in casual games. You can't show them with dice because they might be mistaken for +1/+1 counters and you can't just remember them bec…
-
@HeroKP For the sake of saying what I said before, permanent effects based on spent mana is probably a bad idea. We only see that in un-sets for a reason. On a separate note, are the blue-red guys a bit more artifice-y now?
-
Here's that thing I was rambling about earlier. It's unfinished and generally bad, but you get what I mean. Maybe. https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1m6jHJehpbsfKVDng2RsXuYpBtU9Qdf3UKgIPBOJK-xQ/edit?usp=sharing For the sake of saying it, this…
-
I'm after Lorwyn / Shadowmoor (or anything executed with their picturesque-ness) as a first pick, but I'd honestly like to see Kaldheim turn up because I'm aware that there's a lot of cool stuff that can be done with snow permanents and I wasn't aro…
-
@Dom_Rocks Make a Disqus account and then just log into it. I'm pretty sure you can use other things as well, but that's what I use.
-
@HeroKP Mass taunt isn't in red because red does taunting through forcing creatures to attack and "Cardname must be blocked if able." which doesn't draw all aggro, just some (it's also pretty rare in red, admittedly, but it's actually a pretty rare …
-
@HeroKP Neat concept, though I should probably point out that the ability should be worded slightly differently ("All creatures able to block Cardname do so.") and that it's an ability that appears almost entirely in green (never red) with a typical…
-
@HeroKP NO nope no nonono... Please no, land destruction is cool in moderation, but not cool en masse if that's what you're suggesting. Also, that card's stupid because I can draft a load of copies of it (because it's a common) and then just play a…
-
@HeroKP Primarily related to Curious Chiefgob (though I remember seeing this in other cards for this), creature types should always be capitalised. Explosive Spores isn't worded correctly and should read something like: ____________________________…
-
@HeroKP Ok, fair point. Allow me to rephrase that as "Black only looks at hands as a byproduct of targeted discard effects and similar. It doesn't just look at cards for the knowledge alone."