MemoryHead
About
- Username
- MemoryHead
- Joined
- Visits
- 5,188
- Last Active
- Roles
- Member
Comments
-
@LordTachanka123 Do they all exile from the battlefield? Regardless, it definitely needs to target and it's certainly a lot less sane on the balance and design front. Well, that example, anyway. Also sounds like it's basically reskinned imprint if …
-
@LordTachanka123 Have you missed a "from the graveyard" clause from the reminder text on that example? I feel like you have. The aforementioned point of "it's probably not something you can really have thoughts on without seeing specific cards" sti…
-
@LordTachanka123 From what I've seen of it, it's basically a reskin of imprint aimed specifically at the graveyard. Since imprint was basically one of the most open-ended mechanics in existence for design, it's probably not something you can really …
-
@Usaername Since it only started a few days ago and no form of ending-looking comment has taken place, it's safe to say that it's ongoing. That reminds me, I need to actually do this.
-
@TheCenterOfTheUniverse Well, here we go. Sorry this doesn't actually end up saying too much, the card just generally doesn't have many issues, and those it does have are small: - To start, a few incredibly minor points, one of which is more of a …
-
@LordTachanka123 What do you mean by a "non-evil way", exactly? Does you mean that whatever results from the vote has to be good, or that it rewards players for voting a certain way, or something else entirely? You also might need to describe what …
-
@LordTachanka123 When a thread is commented on, it goes to the top of the forum list of threads, and is therefore more likely to be noticed by people or whatever. "Bump" is the thing people tend to say when they're making a comment for no particular…
-
@SNAPcreator7 What's going on with the colors on Honorable Thief? Why not just give it a white-black-gold border?
-
-
@Abu_Jafar Just to point this out, one of the entry conditions is that the card's a legendary creature. Since that isn't, it probably isn't a viable entry.
-
@Abu_Jafar I don't think so. It's just got to have a theme, which could be based on a race, but could just as happily not be.
-
@LordTachanka123 Have you considered making all of your cards and then posting them in a single comment, instead of posting them in many different comments one at a time? It makes it much easier for people to find them as a group, which in turn can …
-
@HeroKP This sounds like it'll be pretty good. I'll definitely try and make a group for it unless something comes up. Are there supposed to be any color limitations or anything similar, or is the only real limit the flavor and designs of our Council…
-
@shadow123 Huh, I'm a form of hand attack now. All ramblings aside, the card's probably got some issues. Here we go: - Instant speed hand attack is always something to be very careful with. The reasoning behind this, in case you don't know, is bec…
-
-
@MiloMindbender They're using purely gold frames (which are only used for cards with three or more colors in their mana cost). Since they're two-color, they should be using the "[Color]/[Other Color]/Gold" frames, which can be found in the "Use alte…
-
@spookoops Making a 0/0 creature is possible. You tick the box to add power and toughness, then enter it in the normal fashion. The difference is that it'll automatically untick the box every time you re-enter the edit screen, so you just have to re…
-
@LordTachanka123 If your intention is to have miracle be a card-type-mechanic sort of thing, you should probably be informed that miracles are already a real thing in MTG and so you probably need a different name (unless you actually mean the real m…
-
@LordTachanka123 Possibly this is because I don't pay enough attention to MaRo, but Curse is a subtype. Surely the point there would be that while it existing as a subtype is acceptable (though reskinning "enchant" as "bless" probably isn't) then ma…
-
@The-DM If you don't mind me being annoying, I'd say that creating a new base card type (blessing, in this case) should be completely off the metaphorical menu, especially if it just seems to be an extra thing stuck onto enchantment Auras. I'd recom…
-
@VSSS The idea behind this thread is that you either give a favorite or provide some sort of comment (preferably constructive or at least useful) on the card or cards posted before yours. I can understand that this can be kind of hard to figure out …
-
@The-DM Start making a card, then press the type dropdown bar (with all of the things like creature, planeswalker and so on). One of the options should be "Enchantment Saga".
-
@Fallen_Lord_Vulganos Meditate doesn't really feel like it'd be made into a mechanic in a real set. Because it's a replacement effect then having multiple cards with it is worthless (you'll only get one draw regardless) and because it stops you from…
-
So are we supposed to be doing things flavored so that they're not conventional red, or with abilities that aren't conventional red? Asking because that card feels super red in terms of flavor, but the ability's not red and shouldn't be in red.
-
@joemamajoe I'd recommend that you either edit your previous comment or make a new one to give that feedback, then. Or favorite the card, of course, which is the other option. It's possible that you're doing one of those as I type this, in which ca…
-
@Temurzoa Thank you for the thoughts and feedback. The point about borders is a good one, and an oversight on my part (the program I was using to create the image automatically set the border to blue and I failed to notice). I'll definitely watch ou…
-
@Dizzydude Dang, you ninja'd me! I'll do feedback for your card as well and then mine will be the current waiting, I guess. - The artist is Russell Dongjun Lu. - A minor point. The I and II ability is missing a capital letter from "put". Just th…
-
@shadow123 I recognise that card! Somebody already told you that you need to state where you're casting the card from, I think, but I'll mention it here anyway because I don't know. Anyhow, onto the main feedback: The base concept seems relatively …
-
@10114209 Ah, okay. I'll try to run up a few test ideas for it when I've got a little more time.