MTG Cardsmith Community Forums
MemoryHead
About
- Username
- MemoryHead
- Joined
- Visits
- 5,188
- Last Active
- Roles
- Member
Comments
-
@Fantastickill7 Would I be correct in saying that the creature rule applied to the real Signature Spellbooks we've seen (that there aren't any creatures) isn't a thing in this contest?
-
@Ranshi Do you have any preference for what you'd be portrayed as?
-
@TenebrisNemo I'm going to voice disagreements with a few of the points you've made there: - Lotus-Eye Mystics returns a card type that's far less relevant in all formats. Many decks don't run a single enchantment, but I'd think that I'd be hard-p…
-
@Scott_Anderson It's my opinion that it's your card an so you technically can do that if you want to, but it's not something you should be doing, especially with something so mundane as an established creature type. The only card that I can think of…
-
The main way I can think of to achieve a triple-sided card (and perhaps the most obvious) would be a transforming card where one side is also a Kamigawa flip card or something similar. You've also got the whole morph thing, but since that renders on…
-
Just put my favorites on whatever you want of mine that seems deserving.
-
@Rayne-Lord I know it doesn't really answer your question, but one method (and the one I use in that kind of situation for preference) is running the image through a site like Imgur. That gives it an image link that the HTML code can use.
-
@Rayne-Lord Go and check out this thread. If you're just looking for that one thing, the easiest place to find it is probably the second page. http://forums.mtgcardsmith.com/discussion/809/tutorial-forum-post-coding/p1
-
From a mechanical perspective, here are a few things: - They probably shouldn't have cast triggers. Probably "When CARDNAME enters the battlefield" instead. "When you cast this spell" triggers on creatures are limited almost entirely to the Eldraz…
-
Ok, I'd just like to note that I wrote about three paragraphs desperately trying to consider the balance while ignoring the fact that this classes as an un-card, but I just can't do it. By referring to card rarity, this is an un-card. That's it. I'v…
-
@Omtegu I feel like putting in more than one word at a time kind of defeats the point...
-
@KorandAngels Log into Untap, go into the "Decks" section, choose a deck (or create a new one) and the option "Add a missing card to database" will be at the top. Press that, then fill in the details.
-
For the glory of Ehai: The Mohha and his priesthood have long spoken of the Unfinished Tomb, the place that the Traitor-God Authis was to be laid to rest. Evil still exists in the world in the form of barbarian outlanders and dissenters against t…
-
@Corwinnn
-
Since I'm relatively certain that this is a significant part of what you're looking for, here are the Gatherer and Scryfall lists of official planeswalker cards: Gatherer: https://gatherer.wizards.com/Pages/Search/Default.aspx?page=1&type=+[Pla…
-
So is the idea that they're supposed to have some sort of activated ability or capability other than just being able to tap for two colors of mana?
-
@Omtegu You're trying to put up preview cards, which are specific to individual accounts. You've got to publish the card before you can upload it here as a link. An alternative would be uploading the image, a process that is explained in this discus…
-
@Omtegu I'd recommend five, because even five is a lot of cards to be making for a casual challenge. Ten would certainly be too much for all but a few. Also, is the entry of old cards allowed?
-
Just out of interest, what's the idea with it being a cycle of six? If you're doing two color lands then you'll probably make them in allied or enemy colors, and since each of those is made up of five color combinations then you'll have one card lef…
-
I can't be certain whether this really fits with the heart of the challenge because it becomes a creature, but it's something:
-
@Bremtreaty The concept behind a mechanic is that it has has to have the same wording whenever and wherever it appears (or almost the same in a more un-style build. See Super-Duper Death Ray). If you're having to change the wording of a mechanic in …
-
-
@Bowler218 Yep. The Ixalan block rotated out of standard a little while ago.
-
If you think that Fleet Swallower's scary then I know a card that'll really Traumatize you: I'm not sorry. Talking a little more seriously, it certainly doesn't need banning. It's too expensive, too inefficient, too slow and too vulnerable. Mill…
-
@Fantastickill7 Considering how cards that support Elf tribal tend to work, Ephalioth's probably a little too good. He's got a body and ability that are pretty decent by themselves (3/3 for 3, evasion in the form of trample, notable bonus whenever y…
-
@KorandAngels HeroKP's card is on mtg.design, which might influence whether you can see it.
-
This is looking like something out of a Robo-Rosewater program.
-
@ArchieTaylor You've forgotten to put a clause on Stairway to Heaven saying what you've got to do with the permanents you search up.
-
-
@CBunkles That'd make more complex cards using the mechanic (such as a card with a passive ability that'd only work when it was a creature) into ruling nightmares and so it doesn't really work. To give an example of what I was thinking: CARDNAME …