MTG Cardsmith Community Forums
Stormtide
About
- Username
- Stormtide
- Joined
- Visits
- 209
- Last Active
- Roles
- Member
Comments
-
I meant a way that they could be created naturally (i.e. formed from the earth, no human intervention). Might be weird, but could also be cool if done well.
-
Could we actually make living weapon in green too? Seems like something green might do with equipment, and Germ seems like a very G/B creature type. And is there any way we could make "natural" equipment? Green would be all over that.
-
-
I'm working on a very color imbalanced semi-set (only golgari) on a plane called "the Rotwood". It was a great, mono-green forest, but it was hit with a powerful spell from a necromancer, so nearly everything was turned into zombies.
-
White could have benefits for having equipped creatures. Some would care if they're equipped, and intants/ sorceries could care if any creature (you control) is equipped. White and red love equipment, and blue loves artifacts, so those three shouldn…
-
-
@KrampisZman Look at the beginning requirements, the first card in the thread, and the next post.
-
I think green might be good for "as long as this creature is equipped" effects. That seems like the area of equipment that would fit best in green's color pie. And if you're willing to let it return, living weapon could be good for black.
-
@KrampisZman you have to add on or take away a rule, but you can't do both. (Add in this case, since taking away would make it have no rules)
-
Also, I think colored artifacts could return. They'd make some interesting equipment.
-
Can there be a native walker that travels around the multiverse collecting equipment? This would allow for some interesting lore. Also, what will black and green do for this set? Neither plays well with equipment
-
@TenebrisNemo Done Thanks for participating everybody!
-
Curret Rule: Wizard Tribal
-
@Gelectrode Is @Corwinnn another account of yours? Gel-Ectrode was made by them. Or do you just like the card since it uses your name?
-
Results have been decided. Through my rigorous algorithm (Which ones looked the most fun, were the most balanced, and fit the contest the most), these 3 have been chosen. 3rd- @atrus159 with Colfenor, the Seedfather https://mtgcardsmith.com/view/co…
-
-
In making this, I realized that Tikis would work well with an enchantment theme
-
@RayearthIX Sorry, I closed the contest yesterday, though I guess I should put that in the title. (check a few comments before. It is easy to miss)
-
Current rules: Multicolored, Artifact, "you lose the game" in the text, equipment.
-
-
@captain_Pugsley They didn't follow this policy in the earlier days, though I'll admit there are more recent examples. And I guess it is pseudo-mana
-
@captain_Pugsley flavorwise, it's a land, but mechanically, lands tend to want some mana ability. It seems like good artifact territory.
-
We should probably start on (very basic) philosophies for the factions now. This isn't my strong suit. However, I've found some things. http://www.mtgsalvation.com/forums/magic-fundamentals/custom-card-creation/478974-4-color-design-philosophy-now-…
-
Bump.
-
For when you need to buy some more time.
-
@Connor2001 Seems a bit unbalanced. I think the opponent should get some say in the matter. Maybe picking two, and they pick one to gain control of...
-
The contest is ending today. I'm leaving it open so @atrus159 can remake his card (if he wants to), but judging will begin today. Results will be up by Monday, but I don't have an exact date.
-
Bump?
-
Bump?
-
Bump?