TheDukeOfPork
|PnhqlnqipFoVRiDtaHUDhCQqO,eweLYERhKhN. 
    About
- Username
 - TheDukeOfPork
 - Joined
 - Visits
 - 651
 - Last Active
 - Roles
 - Member
 
Comments
- 
                OK, let's move the chat onto the set discussion: https://forums.mtgcardsmith.com/discussion/5715/science-themed-set-concepts#latest
 - 
                I'm fairly sure it's going to be aimed at the Commander format. Like GNR and RNA, we could branch five science branches into two sets and call it a block. We might not want to pin it down to one color combo per science branch, e.g. Horology could …
 - 
                Ah. Hmm. I think 260-290, maybe?
 - 
                W-w-w-w-w-whaaaat....? 1.30? But, but, it's 6.46! JK, I know about time zones.
 - 
                @Corwinnn @Tomigon This discussion is closed.
 - 
                Actually....no. Wait....five guilds?
 - 
                Yeah, but a lot of Ravnica cards aren't based on a guild.
 - 
                Have I said something wrong? It was just the way that @HeroKP was talking implied to me like it was a, er, how do I put this......their set as well, kind of.
 - 
                
 - 
                @CS101 You take the favourites!
 - 
                Thanks! Also, that was weird.... I got 2 notifications for your one comment....And then when I click one of them...It said 'Comment Not Found'....?
 - 
                A Mystery Challenge: Create a creature that makes you sacrifice an artifact as a cost for an ability. Another box!
 - 
                
 - 
                Yay!
 - 
                Groooooooaaaaan. Do I have to the story?
 - 
                Favourite this, please: https://mtgcardsmith.com/view/adept-swinger?list=user
 - 
                @HeroKP, I'd actually prefer it if you didn't. I have access to discord but I'm only allowed to contact friends with it. (Plus one of my computers doesn't have dsicord) I'm thinking 180-210 cards in this set, but we could always lower it. I'll st…
 - 
                Yes, I see it....
 - 
                11th place!
 - 
                yay!
 - 
                Thanks so much! Happy birthday @DrakeGladis!
 - 
                I'm also thinking of having a legendary creature for each branch of science I introduce...but maybe I'm too eager.
 - 
                I mean, Izzet portrayed a smaller amount of physics, so I think that's kind of the focus. Biology won't be huge, but Zoology will take part. I feel no need to introduce archaelogy. Horology will play a giant role in when the experiments start going …
 - 
                bump
 - 
                KK.
 - 
                Because WCIAH said almost exactly the same thing as you.
 - 
                Abaa said '?' and I wasn't quite sure why he said '?' so I said '??' and then it kind of turned into a game when you showed up.
 - 
                Ohhhhhhh I see what you mean.
 - 
                This getting into spam. Why are we 'question-marking'?
 - 
                ????
 
 MTG Cardsmith Community Forums