MTG Cardsmith Community Forums
bnew07
About
- Username
- bnew07
- Joined
- Visits
- 10,453
- Last Active
- Roles
- Member
Comments
-
Here are the results for the challenge: 5th Place: @sorinjace with Another Chance This card has some templating issues (“put there by an opponent” doesn’t actually work AND the card should specify that you can only target cards you own) but the …
-
@shadow123 I will give you a 1 day extension. For the rest of the entrants, This contest is closed for judging
-
@Phelgming Later this evening is perfectly fine.
-
Last day to get in entries!
-
@shadow123 @Fallen_Lord_Vulganos Those are both acceptable entries.
-
@Fantastickill7 Yes that does count. @Faiths_Guide For reference, entries don't have to grant card advantage they just have to address white's longevity problem in games which is most easily addressed with card advantafe
-
@sorinjace Yes, that is a valid entry. @Dizzydude For this challenge symmetrical draw is not allowed so that entry doesn’t meet the contest criteria
-
@Lastjustice The contest rules clearly stated that card draw is a break in white and would not be accepted in the challenge. The use of happily ever after was only as a visual aid to show how WOTC has so far decided to expand white's color pie. T…
-
@Fantastickill7 Yes it does
-
I nominate The Fall of the House of Vess by @TheCenterOfTheUniverse https://mtgcardsmith.com/view/the-fall-of-the-house-of-vess?list=user
-
Out of the 26 cards submitted so far, only the following 5 meet the contest criteria: Pious Arcanist & Tireless Angel by @Faiths_Guide Angel of the Silver Legion by @EternalWolf88 Divine Ascension by @sanjaya666 Summon Heroic Spirit by @Xero0 …
-
First you chop your tree... Then you decorate it... Then Santa comes with his reindeer... He decides what gifts you deserve... And you open them!
-
@Faiths_Guide Investigate is considered the same as card draw. The ability of a card to investigate once is essentially a cantrip but investigating multiple times is raw card advantage that white cannot have
-
Now a circuit challenge!
-
@Faiths_Guide @TenebrisNemo In my opinion it does provide raw card advantage in a way that white shouldn’t. Also, Faith_Guide’s last entry is missing a P/T
-
@Tomigon Thanks a lot you are right I updated the wording
-
@Faiths_Guide Thanks a lot for the feedback! Thoughts on the new version of Blizzard Prism. I modified it slightly to differentiate it from Chromatic Lantern. Also, what do you think of Abominable Snowballer?
-
My mechanic is called Enact. It is flavored around laws, which fit thematically for the Azorius but likely wouldn’t have enough mechanical support space in a Ravnica set to flourish. I think the best fit for this mechanic would be on a new world (li…
-
-
@Aggroman15 Please fave this: https://mtgcardsmith.com/view/wildseeker?list=set&set=30793
-
-
@Tomigon I agree on both counts.
-
Fury Slightly modified rules text for additional clarity, used without the keyword name. Slayer Used in unkeyworded form Jump-Scare Renamed “Reiterate” for more neutral flavor, added 'Exile up resolution' clause (like Flashback) to minimize re…
-
@shadow123 Thanks a lot!
-
-
@ningyounk Personally, I like the name masterwork and thought the flavor was clear and strong. I do think you want the name of the mechanic to match the name of the thing “that becomes your only ____”. Having two different names can at best slight…
-
@EnvyReaper I am not familiar with Dumaran...what parts were similar?