MTG Cardsmith Community Forums
Enchantment Contest #5
This discussion has been closed.
Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Comments
Actual Card: http://mtgcardsmith.com/view/curse-of-the-doppelganger?list=user
(The second effect targets the token not the actual enchantment itself just encase you were confused.)
Token for the Card: http://mtgcardsmith.com/view/doppelganger-12?list=user
Judging begins... eventually.
You deleted all your entries...?
Each card has been rated from 1-10
@Lujikul:
http://mtgcardsmith.com/view/chained-by-responsibility - 4.5
@Amimist:
http://mtgcardsmith.com/view/constancy - 8
@RohanDragoon:
http://mtgcardsmith.com/view/fiery-resolve - 8
http://mtgcardsmith.com/view/divine-sanctuary-2?list=user - 7
@fabiocbinbutter
http://mtgcardsmith.com/view/duality-of-light?list=user - 6
http://mtgcardsmith.com/view/mass-equivalence?list=user - 6
@jabrewer79:
http://mtgcardsmith.com/view/infrangible-accord-2?list=user - 8.5
@Connor2001:
http://mtgcardsmith.com/view/talisman-seal?list=user - 6
http://mtgcardsmith.com/view/unbridled-rage-1 - 6
http://mtgcardsmith.com/view/consuming-insanity - 5
@Eco6780:
http://mtgcardsmith.com/view/curse-of-the-doppelganger?list=user - 7
@Connor2001 will receive an honorable mention here for his outstanding three cards, my favorite was http://mtgcardsmith.com/view/talisman-seal?list=user. The reason they didn't get higher ratings from me is because each one of them felt a bit disjointed. One ability I always liked, but the other I did/didn't and it just didn't seem to function well with the other (or make logical sense alongside the other from a flavor perspective).
@fabiocbinbutter is also receiving honorable mention for his card http://mtgcardsmith.com/view/mass-equivalence?list=user. If it weren't for the sheer "power-overload" capability of the land enchant portion this thing would've placed for sure.
XD
1st - @jabrewer79 with http://mtgcardsmith.com/view/infrangible-accord-2?list=user
2nd - @RohanDragoon with http://mtgcardsmith.com/view/fiery-resolve
3rd - @Animist with http://mtgcardsmith.com/view/constancy
(Animist enters=Animist places)
@jabrewer79, your Infrangible Accord is beautiful. I would imagine this thing could get broken, but you helped make that more difficult by specifying "nontoken". Once this thing starts it'll wipe every creature/walker you got and you'll get a card for each. So when you cast this you must make sure you know what you are doing. Very cool!
@RohanDragoon, Fiery Resolve is great, makes flavor sense and is functional while remaining reasonably costed. Good flavor, good art, good card! Simple and good.
@Animist, 3rd (instead of higher) with your Constancy for two reasons: Both Infrangible Accord and Fiery Resolve had artwork that made the card even easier to understand whereas yours was just good but didn't really contribute to the rules/flavor. You also had quoted flavor text (which I really liked) but didn't give the speakers name.
These weren't enough to make your card lower than 8/10 IMO so you still take 3rd! I also just have to judge you more critically cause you're so inexplicably good!
Congratulations all!
@RohanDragoon: 2 favorites on cards of your choosing, at my discretion, I may ask you to choose an alternate card.
@Animist: 1 favorite on a card of your choosing, at my discretion, I may ask you to choose an alternate card.
Keep in mind that (as a judge) I still cannot favorite entries for Tribal Trouble just yet!
@jabrewer79 - Get ready to judge Enchantment Contest #6! Best of luck!
Thanks for the cool challenge! Congrats everyone.
Time to host my first contest eh? Okay, so admittedly, a little nervous about that. Also excited. I hope to have that up today. If not, it will be up tomorrow. I gotta look through the previous Enchantment contests a bit first and decide what kinda twist I want to put on it.
Congrats @everyone else.
Congrats @Everyone! Thanks for making this a fun contest!
This discussion is closed.