@Tomigon Thanks for the recognition! I must ask though, why such the dramatic change to Baleful Flames? (It's because it's broken in storm isn't it? I know storm is also represented in the set so that makes sense.) Thanks again!
@FangQuil The biggest reason is your card looks a bit op, and the mechanic is a bit complex, so I wanted it to be simpler. It's interesting card though. I like it. The reason I changed the art is; I loved the art you use on that card, so I googled the artist. But I couldn't find that art when I googled "Wayne Kelly". So I googled that picture, I found that art, but there's no Wayne Kelly's name with it. So I decided to use different art, just in case you credited wrong artist. The new art made me rethink the card's effect. Then that big change happened! Hahaha! But I got concept from your card, and I still think it's your card, so I must mention you! Thanks! XD
Name aside, it's not a burn spell. This common presents Raze, a mechanic that adds a circumstantial beneficial effect as long as the spell's target has counters on it. Also, non-creature destruction. Unless your lands have counters, roilmage.
Cheap white removal. Unless you STRIVE for a larger defensive stance, eh?
Wordplay aside, it might seem way too powerful. But realisticly, it's monocolored all the way and only affects attacking creatures, which means it won't be as effective to weenie/agressive decks, and Striving would require quite an amount of open mana during your opponent's turns.
Reckless red card draw, monocolored as well. I remade this. Quite a few times. While I like the concept, I fear the surprise low mana cost goblin/vampire horde with Delirium. Good thing the set almost doesn't showcase such. I feel like the topdecking stage makes up one of the most unstable and exhilarating moments in the game, fitting red's gambling nature, so there it is.
I'll still be looking out for this set, seems very interesting! Would love to make a few decks out of it when it's done. Have a good one, ya'll.
@Yururu Cool cards! I think correct wording of Burn to the Ground is "Destroy target artifact or land." "Raze - If that permanent has any counters on it, Burnt to the Ground costs {3} less to cast."
Also, Admonish's cost is a bit cheap. I would remake it {1}{w}{w}. And I think the name is too weak for what it does :P How about God'd Admonish or something? Does that sounds wrong?
If those parts are fixed, I'll add them to the set!
I want draw card in red, but I'm not sure Desultory Ecstasy is doing it in the way red does. Also, red cards doesn't use the words "lose life". And the card's power might be a bit powerful. I'll think about the update idea for that.
I've reworded Burn to the Ground. I agree too on Admonish, it was undercosted, so I edited it too. Declaration in Stone wasn't that great a comparison with it, even though at some point it was in my mind.
I feel like Admonish is striking for how unused it is, almost archaic. Stronger than Reprimand in sound, at least. Although I'm not sure, as English isn't my native language either. Even so, I'd rather it stay as is.
As of Desultory Ecstasy, I'm not really keen on changing it. Victorius Destruction, Menacing Ogre and Soulgorger Orgg are red cards with "lose life", and present betting life on a gamble-style as well. I'm keen to see how you update'll be like, but I might just leave it be as is, in the set or otherwise. Anyway, happy smithing.
@Tomigon If you still want me to, I can redo the Front Line Slaughter and Toil of the Damned tomorrow. Just saw that you had posted for some wording fixes
@RohanDragoon I just knew that once a card is deleted, it's no longer show up it Untap.. so I'll make copies of all cards in my 2nd account, just in case you delete it again. So you don't need to remake it if you don't want to
I just knew that if a card is deleted in this site, that card no longer appears in Untap.in. So I'll make a copy of your cards in my 2nd account from now on!
Comments
@Lujikul
http://mtgcardsmith.com/view/dripping-menace?list=set&set=10983
@Mysterious_Gangsta
http://mtgcardsmith.com/view/thunderflash-1?list=set&set=10983
@Mila
http://mtgcardsmith.com/view/angelic-griffin-2?list=set&set=10983
@FblthpTheStormCrow
http://mtgcardsmith.com/view/spirits-protection?list=set&set=10983
I'll use a new art : http://mtgcardsmith.com/view/spirits-protection-1?list=user
@Corwinnn
http://mtgcardsmith.com/view/wingmill?list=set&set=10983
Just a heads up that I've remade the consonance cards
http://mtgcardsmith.com/view/rhythmic-denial-1
http://mtgcardsmith.com/view/charged-bolt-3
Thanks to @strongbelieves for the suggestion.
@FblthpTheStormCrow You deserve it! You look many people's cards. That's a great thing.
http://mtgcardsmith.com/view/crow-nest-1?list=user
@FangQuil
The biggest reason is your card looks a bit op, and the mechanic is a bit complex, so I wanted it to be simpler. It's interesting card though. I like it.
The reason I changed the art is; I loved the art you use on that card, so I googled the artist. But I couldn't find that art when I googled "Wayne Kelly". So I googled that picture, I found that art, but there's no Wayne Kelly's name with it. So I decided to use different art, just in case you credited wrong artist. The new art made me rethink the card's effect. Then that big change happened! Hahaha!
But I got concept from your card, and I still think it's your card, so I must mention you! Thanks! XD
Uncommon: http://mtgcardsmith.com/view/argusian-mage?list=user
Rare: http://mtgcardsmith.com/view/feeling-of-anguish?list=user
Anyway, these are the other three, I noticed you have very few artifacts there, so here are some Equipments:
Rare: http://mtgcardsmith.com/view/stormriders-hammer
Uncommon: http://mtgcardsmith.com/view/blazing-shield-of-foriys
And a storm crow: http://mtgcardsmith.com/view/stormwing-owl
Name aside, it's not a burn spell. This common presents Raze, a mechanic that adds a circumstantial beneficial effect as long as the spell's target has counters on it. Also, non-creature destruction. Unless your lands have counters, roilmage.
Cheap white removal. Unless you STRIVE for a larger defensive stance, eh?
Wordplay aside, it might seem way too powerful. But realisticly, it's monocolored all the way and only affects attacking creatures, which means it won't be as effective to weenie/agressive decks, and Striving would require quite an amount of open mana during your opponent's turns.
Reckless red card draw, monocolored as well. I remade this. Quite a few times. While I like the concept, I fear the surprise low mana cost goblin/vampire horde with Delirium. Good thing the set almost doesn't showcase such. I feel like the topdecking stage makes up one of the most unstable and exhilarating moments in the game, fitting red's gambling nature, so there it is.
I'll still be looking out for this set, seems very interesting! Would love to make a few decks out of it when it's done. Have a good one, ya'll.
I think correct wording of Burn to the Ground is
"Destroy target artifact or land."
"Raze - If that permanent has any counters on it, Burnt to the Ground costs {3} less to cast."
Also, Admonish's cost is a bit cheap. I would remake it {1}{w}{w}. And I think the name is too weak for what it does :P How about God'd Admonish or something? Does that sounds wrong?
If those parts are fixed, I'll add them to the set!
I want draw card in red, but I'm not sure Desultory Ecstasy is doing it in the way red does. Also, red cards doesn't use the words "lose life". And the card's power might be a bit powerful. I'll think about the update idea for that.
@Rednaxela @Flatfish
I added some of your cards to the set!
I feel like Admonish is striking for how unused it is, almost archaic. Stronger than Reprimand in sound, at least. Although I'm not sure, as English isn't my native language either. Even so, I'd rather it stay as is.
As of Desultory Ecstasy, I'm not really keen on changing it. Victorius Destruction, Menacing Ogre and Soulgorger Orgg are red cards with "lose life", and present betting life on a gamble-style as well. I'm keen to see how you update'll be like, but I might just leave it be as is, in the set or otherwise. Anyway, happy smithing.
Thanks. Happy smithing too!
http://mtgcardsmith.com/view/blooming-orchid-3?list=user
If you still want me to, I can redo the Front Line Slaughter and Toil of the Damned tomorrow. Just saw that you had posted for some wording fixes
I just knew that once a card is deleted, it's no longer show up it Untap.. so I'll make copies of all cards in my 2nd account, just in case you delete it again. So you don't need to remake it if you don't want to
http://mtgcardsmith.com/view/starfeathered-owl?list=user
Uncommon:
http://mtgcardsmith.com/view/systematic-murdering?list=user
Rare:
http://mtgcardsmith.com/view/siege-the-kingdom?list=user (into) http://mtgcardsmith.com/view/siege-the-castle-3?list=user
http://mtgcardsmith.com/view/forgotten-obelisk-1
Awesome! Thanks so much!
http://mtgcardsmith.com/view/elven-assassin-4?list=user