MTG Cardsmith Community Forums
Post your cards here, see what others think
This discussion has been closed.
Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Comments
Yeah, 'tap out' thing is the issue.. I'm trying to fix Dechujoh64's mechanic ( http://forums.mtgcardsmith.com/discussion/comment/95816/#Comment_95816 ) without making a big change to the concept, but it seems difficult.
Anyway thanks a lot!
The way it's phrased currently, the lands are tapped during the process of casting the spell (CR 601.2h specifically). The person casting the spell would still be acting with their own priority and the opponent wouldn't be able to respond to any actions until the spell is cast.
Yeap my bad, you can't tap them in response. Actually the fact that I got it confused is the perfect example of why you must never ever ever create a card that produces a situation where multiple players can fight over a spell or ability's control. That confuses people. If you use your opponent's resource, make sure there is no doubt that they can't even try to use it or you're going to get a lot of frustrating situations.
Once again, I recommend looking at the M-Files for Mnemonic Betrayal. They even considered preventing your opponent from doing anything to avoid priority fights. It doesn't mean that the card wouldn't work on MTG Arena for instance, it just means that most players would screw it up while trying to understand how it works. Really, that's not material for a mechanic you put on several cards.
https://mtgcardsmith.com/view/skullbiter-sprite
https://mtgcardsmith.com/view/raided-by-ronin
I like it. On flavor with Dimir, confers a good advantage, but one that you have to put in some work for. I like that its keywords lend itself toward triggering its own rules text.
@Credius
This card seems overpowered, to me. It shuts down aggro too efficiently. If I were to re-write this rules text, my thinking would cause it to be so:
Enchant player
Enchanted player may skip their draw step.
Whenever enchanted player draws a card, deal 1 damage to each creature and planeswalker on the battlefield under their control.
Whenever a creature dies as a result of this damage, enchanted player loses life equal to that creature's power and you gain life equal to that creature's toughness.
https://mtgcardsmith.com/view/micolash-host-of-the-nightmare
Here's mine. Feel free to ignore the name inspiration altogether, I'm only looking for feedback based on the way the card operates.
Edit: Here's a second one, if anyone would like to weigh in.
https://mtgcardsmith.com/view/mana-force
Wouldn't it make more sense just to put Undying 3?
Also the wording is giving me a headache
On the other hand, I don't think my commander is half bad
https://mtgcardsmith.com/view/prophetic-herald-1?list=user
https://mtgcardsmith.com/view/prophetic-tracker-1?list=user
https://mtgcardsmith.com/view/prophetic-empath-1?list=user
IDK...
<a href=Website link><img src=Image address width=35%></a>(Copy and paste this into a comment.)
Replace Website link with the link and replace Image address with the image's address.
Thoughts?
https://mtgcardsmith.com/view/guardian-demon
Hey I'm fairly new als done a few cards already. I would like to get some Feedback. I mostly play Commander so my cards are mostly based around that. Some cards might not appear very serious but I always tried to wright the abilities as authentic as possible.
Thanks in advance.
https://mtgcardsmith.com/view/wrath-of-the-woken-god-1?list=user
https://mtgcardsmith.com/view/blessing-of-the-dreaming-god?list=user
https://mtgcardsmith.com/view/consult-the-elder-chaos?list=user
https://mtgcardsmith.com/view/mi-go-seeker?list=user
It clarifies in his comment section
I love Mnemonic Betrayal as a card, so I decided to make a commander around it. I specifically made it just a Wizard because who knows what Irikul is. Thoughts?