@TrippleBoggey3, I'm sorry If sounded rude, I'm just trying to give advise to make it better. (If it needs improvement)
Suicidal Belover is good. Not much needed to improve in my opinion. You maybe could enhance the second sentence by adding an adjective before the second "Suffering" or something like that. I do also like the ability because it really fits the cards backstory.
Downcast Poet is a bit repetitive. I think the third sentence makes it repetitive. I would recommend to only put 2 Nouns and find a replacement for the word "see" in that sentence. Other than that, I do like this one as well. The sentence wasn't Bad though, just saying.
@Leaf_Juggernaut, that card is pretty OP, but for a Mythic 7 mana 5/6, I can't say much on that. It's formatting is a bit off, and I would recommend a fix on the wording. The idea is nice though. In a mono red deck, it would easily wreck someone. "You wanna not block and take 5 damage, or block, have a creature die, and lose 7 life?"
There should be some requirement that you leave a constructive comment on the most recent previous couple of designs (that weren't yours) before you post your own design.
This would hopefully do two positive things: 1) prevent people from spamming this with their designs without contributing feedback to others. 2) Give people who posted cards here some guaranteed critiques of their cards.
@TrippleBoggey3 The Cards Have really nice design, But they seem too powerful if a deck has multiple of them on the battlefield. I would recommend To make them Legendaries. All But "Gaze Amist" need to be Legendaries. I did really like the cards.
@DankSoulsRager, what if it gets put back onto the battlefield and it isn't during the combat phase? I think it needs a clause that it returns at the beginning of your next combat phase, or something.
@MrRansom Thanks for telling me. The whole reason I made the card was because the other day I was in a match and I kept returning this guy's creature to his hand with aetherize and aetherspouts, so I figured I would make a card to counter that.
@Arceus8523, that card is way to OP. It can activate many triggered abilities like prowess, and have almost no punishment. Technically, it's just "Spells you control have 'If this spell would be successfully cast, discard this card. Add X mana to your mana pool, where X is the converted mana cost of this card'" But then, now that I think of it, since you don't get to draw a card and if this is in tournament, you would chances are have not too many cards in your hand. I don't know. You decide. But this does give me an idea for a mechanic: "Discard this card. Add X to your mana pool." @DankSoulsRager, It all depends on the match. It can be a risk in tournament, so not many copies would be put in a deck. I don't feel it'll see much constructed gameplay. I mean, in casual middle/high school, maybe, but for tournament? Why would you need this card? Unless your dead or dying, your cards in your hand will not work with the newer cards.
Here's a card I made a long time ago that I'm still extremely fond of. (If I were to remake it, I'd probably want to account for enchantment creatures, too.)
@TrippleBoggey3 Lol! Nice job man! I found that it would have been slightly better if it said "terms and conditions featured above" instead of "terms and conditions featured below" but I just imagine it says that.
Comments
Do you think it's balanced?
Btw, if you really like long flavor text, how is this: http://mtgcardsmith.com/user/TrippleBoggey3/sets/12721
It's really sad...
Edit: http://mtgcardsmith.com/view/suicidal-belover?list=user
Suicidal Belover is good. Not much needed to improve in my opinion. You maybe could enhance the second sentence by adding an adjective before the second "Suffering" or something like that.
I do also like the ability because it really fits the cards backstory.
Downcast Poet is a bit repetitive. I think the third sentence makes it repetitive. I would recommend to only put 2 Nouns and find a replacement for the word "see" in that sentence. Other than that, I do like this one as well. The sentence wasn't Bad though, just saying.
into
http://mtgcardsmith.com/view/mauteradeath-assimilated?list=user
I'm mainly putting this here to get feedback on my wording as well as card balance, but anything you have to say about it would be very appreciated!
What do you cardsmithers think about this card
@Leaf_Juggernaut, that card is pretty OP, but for a Mythic 7 mana 5/6, I can't say much on that. It's formatting is a bit off, and I would recommend a fix on the wording. The idea is nice though. In a mono red deck, it would easily wreck someone. "You wanna not block and take 5 damage, or block, have a creature die, and lose 7 life?"
This would hopefully do two positive things:
1) prevent people from spamming this with their designs without contributing feedback to others.
2) Give people who posted cards here some guaranteed critiques of their cards.
Just an idea...
What do you guys think of this card?
Thanks for telling me. The whole reason I made the card was because the other day I was in a match and I kept returning this guy's creature to his hand with aetherize and aetherspouts, so I figured I would make a card to counter that.
Need some feedback on wording and balancing.
http://mtgcardsmith.com/view/parallel-planes-1?list=user
@DankSoulsRager, It all depends on the match. It can be a risk in tournament, so not many copies would be put in a deck. I don't feel it'll see much constructed gameplay. I mean, in casual middle/high school, maybe, but for tournament? Why would you need this card? Unless your dead or dying, your cards in your hand will not work with the newer cards.
http://mtgcardsmith.com/view/the-bag-of-evil-holding
What do you guys think of this card? And it flavor text?
http://mtgcardsmith.com/view/dragons-grave