MTG Cardsmith Community Forums
Contest: Party Adventure Gametype
This discussion has been closed.
Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Comments
What you've done is also perfectly acceptable! I was just letting you know for reference.
fixed it.
@DragonFaceEater - Typo on Vorae
@Faiths_Guide - You left an open bracket on Chek. (I think top card revealed always is neat)
@DingusXeon - Little typo on I'ka in her activated ability
42nd: http://mtgcardsmith.com/view/lario-the-white-cathar
Oh darn, copied it off MTG and missed half the parentheses...
1st entry: http://mtgcardsmith.com/view/yori-amphibious-assassin
http://mtgcardsmith.com/view/xin-queen-of-scales
Two different effects. Both of which are acceptable.
You could say "Whenever a creature you control deals combat damage to a player/opponent, ..."
[ Like - http://gatherer.wizards.com/Pages/Card/Details.aspx?multiverseid=383311 ]
Alternatively, you could say "Whenever a source you control deals damage to a player/opponent, ..."
[ Like - http://gatherer.wizards.com/Pages/Card/Details.aspx?multiverseid=383311 ]
They are (obviously) different in their application and effectiveness, so it depends on what you want.
(Is this what you were asking? Guess not, not really... Oops.)
43rd: http://mtgcardsmith.com/view/orentorio-city-guard
http://mtgcardsmith.com/view/wintercreak-the-elder-bark
=== Additionally ===
I would like to further clarify how to refer to Player-Cards.
(Horribly overpowered card, but you get the jist of what I'm trying to express.)
Player-Cards will (for the time being) be used as a placeholder for now. As much as I would love to have the Player-Cards literally be you it would be odd and clunky. Perhaps in the future it will become something even more outrageously janky and complex. But then there is the issue of fitting that all on the card and having it easy to understand. So it's just easier to not refer to the cards themselves as Players but mechanically refer to them as the player's Player-Card and functionally a creature.
Combining the mechanics of being both a player, and a creature is proving difficult.
EDIT: It's 3:30 am and my brain is hurting from this many instances of the word "Player".
44th: http://mtgcardsmith.com/view/dryad-eravashi
45th: http://mtgcardsmith.com/view/noiat-myr-weaponsmith
My next entry, black/red:
http://mtgcardsmith.com/view/pierre-de-rouge-buccaneer
Still in awe by the turnout! Thanks so much guys
I know you were looking for mono and duel colored players cards, but this guy needed to be every color. I did't give him the Mana Pool ability to offset how OP he could get. Instead the deck will have to rely on other mana sources
47th: http://mtgcardsmith.com/view/oriore-the-pyromancer
http://mtgcardsmith.com/view/azeo-warrior-of-sorin-1,
http://mtgcardsmith.com/view/revontheus-the-fallen?list=set&set=13520 (not mine),
http://mtgcardsmith.com/view/estrasseo-devourer-of-souls,
and http://mtgcardsmith.com/view/lord-norio
http://mtgcardsmith.com/view/jahkus-wizard-master