@Ranshi922 I like the idea, but at the same time I feel as though commanders are going to have to be notably less powerful than partner commanders to compensate.
So what are the power level of these decks supposed to be? Can they be super expensive in paper with original duals and mana crypt and that or are they restricted?
Guys, anything that would be really expensive is banned. This mainly is in matter of lands. But it also goes for artifacts. These will be judgement calls. If you have any questions, ask.
@AxNoodle I think less than 4 (in 100-card "singleton") will do nothing but slow the game down most of the time. Maybe I could make it 3?
@ManaChrome Why does Eron exile from the grave? If you want to leave it, I think it could cost a little less. Maybe {2}{r}{g}?
@MemoryHead Agree on everything except for the forcing of the activated ability? I originally had a more-or-less "'forced" ability, but I removed it and went for more typical style affects in Grixis colors. Discard then draw is blue & red (black also likes discard), life loss is black. I dunno, but I thought it was very reasonable Grixis stuff.
@ManaChrome You're more-or-less indifferent to Marr (and yes, at 6 CMC this guy is far from crazy).
@Ranshi922 Like I said before, if you really wanted something that similar to Slimefoot, I'd say to just use Slimefoot. If you were to make Bolodtha more unique, I'd probably be totally fine with it.
Triplet seems pretty ridiculous. I'd suggest just changing it to partner.
I mean the interactions between partners and how to build your deck ect. is confusing enough, and Misudri already has a fairly niche set of abilities. It will get really confusing and difficult not only creating three commanders to interact with each other, but also a deck around them.
@Ranshi922 So wait, there are land cost ($) restrictions now? Personally I don't understand why we would make this distinction since it is very one-sided in its benefit, helping decks with fewer colors and hurting those with more.
We are playing virtually. Decks shouldn't be absurd in terms of power, they should follow EDH rules (and ban lists), but hey shouldn't have additional restrictions IMO.
However, if you don't mind spoilers, I'm not opposed to sharing my current decklist--that doesn't have any custom cards yet--for everyone's inspection.
Currently such a "rule" would only negatively effect @pjbear2005, @KJMartin, @ArinSka, and myself. To compensate, the four of us would probably end up stacking the rest of our decks with more powerful cards, and that won't help anything. I contend that all non-banned lands should be allowed as they will cause the least change in power.
@Ranshi922 If I'm coming across as a pest, please let me know.
I'm really only trying to help, but, if you'd prefer, I can step down from the contest and just help with custom card evaluation. Whatever you think is most helpful, that's what I want to do!
Comments
Triplet (You can have three commanders if they have triplet.)
(I am a triplet so this is meaningful to me!)
(Yeah, sounds cool)
Maybe that's obvious though.
So at most 1 original dual. This is true for 3+ color decks too.
No expeditions lands
No Moxes, etc.
Lol
Mana Vault is on the ban list.
I think less than 4 (in 100-card "singleton") will do nothing but slow the game down most of the time. Maybe I could make it 3?
@ManaChrome
Why does Eron exile from the grave? If you want to leave it, I think it could cost a little less. Maybe {2}{r}{g}?
@MemoryHead
Agree on everything except for the forcing of the activated ability? I originally had a more-or-less "'forced" ability, but I removed it and went for more typical style affects in Grixis colors. Discard then draw is blue & red (black also likes discard), life loss is black. I dunno, but I thought it was very reasonable Grixis stuff.
@ManaChrome
You're more-or-less indifferent to Marr (and yes, at 6 CMC this guy is far from crazy).
@Ranshi922
Like I said before, if you really wanted something that similar to Slimefoot, I'd say to just use Slimefoot. If you were to make Bolodtha more unique, I'd probably be totally fine with it.
I mean the interactions between partners and how to build your deck ect. is confusing enough, and Misudri already has a fairly niche set of abilities. It will get really confusing and difficult not only creating three commanders to interact with each other, but also a deck around them.
And yes, it is kind of silly.
So wait, there are land cost ($) restrictions now? Personally I don't understand why we would make this distinction since it is very one-sided in its benefit, helping decks with fewer colors and hurting those with more.
We are playing virtually. Decks shouldn't be absurd in terms of power, they should follow EDH rules (and ban lists), but hey shouldn't have additional restrictions IMO.
However, if you don't mind spoilers, I'm not opposed to sharing my current decklist--that doesn't have any custom cards yet--for everyone's inspection.
Currently such a "rule" would only negatively effect @pjbear2005, @KJMartin, @ArinSka, and myself. To compensate, the four of us would probably end up stacking the rest of our decks with more powerful cards, and that won't help anything. I contend that all non-banned lands should be allowed as they will cause the least change in power.
If I'm coming across as a pest, please let me know.
I'm really only trying to help, but, if you'd prefer, I can step down from the contest and just help with custom card evaluation. Whatever you think is most helpful, that's what I want to do!
I agree.