Can I rant? Because Kamigawa was great.
I watch the youtube series Pretty Deece, and an interesting video came up. titled:
"Actually, Kamigawa was great"
It talked about standard at the time of Champions of Kamigawa release, and basically to sum it up, Kamigawa did not make players quit because the set was bad, but because it could not deal with the Mirrodin block and Affinity.
So many people talk about how Kamigawa was a bad set, but it wasn't, it just bad credit because people quit because someone bringing their Homebrew deck could not beat Affinity, and Kamigawa didn't deal with problem.
Think about this, please.
"Actually, Kamigawa was great"
It talked about standard at the time of Champions of Kamigawa release, and basically to sum it up, Kamigawa did not make players quit because the set was bad, but because it could not deal with the Mirrodin block and Affinity.
So many people talk about how Kamigawa was a bad set, but it wasn't, it just bad credit because people quit because someone bringing their Homebrew deck could not beat Affinity, and Kamigawa didn't deal with problem.
Think about this, please.
This discussion has been closed.
Comments
hAmIgAwA jesus christ
@Tigersol, well...
Kamigawa was great, there we're some things wrong with it, but we have to remember one thing. Magic was still taking baby steps and learning to read.
The legendary rule at the time SUCKED, and Kamigawa was trying to experiment.
You can't say a set was bad just because Affinty and Kamigawa just didn't have a contest about what can do better.
(And if you are STILL not convinced, then watch that video I linked earlier, then come back and tell me what you think)
"Kamigawa was trying to experiment."
So Bushido didn't work well because it wasn't really done well.
But can you blame Kamigawa trying to experiment?