Custom Set: Sacrum and Impius (SAI) (May need additional input.)

2»

Comments

  • Yes, we can use it. It will have to be legendary, and it'll be more like an enchantment-creature thing.
  • I have the ideas.
  • Idea #1: A new creature type! This is not your traditional type though, as it will not show up on almost ANY cards. The type you may be asking?
    Followers!
    How do you get followers? Miracles and blessings of course!
    Miracle 5rr
    Deal 8 damage to target creature. Put up to 5 follower counters on any creatures you control.
    Why would you want followers? MORE POWER!!!! Somewhat similar to devotion, imagine we make this blessing.
    Blessing of courage rrr
    Bless target follower that attacked this turn.
    Blessed creature has +2/+1 and first strike.

    Anyways, that's the idea.
  • @LordTachanka123 If your intention is to have miracle be a card-type-mechanic sort of thing, you should probably be informed that miracles are already a real thing in MTG and so you probably need a different name (unless you actually mean the real miracle cards, in which case you haven't made it clear).
  • @MemoryHead
    No, I don't mean that, I mean something kind of like a BIG cycle. You know what I mean? They're just called miracles, and they have similar effects?
  • Idea #2:Churches!
    These would be lands that are dedicated to you, so we'd have to find some way to make it YOUR church/temple.
  • @The-DM
    Like any of the ideas?
  • Yes, I do. We'll use the churches, but I'm not too fond with the followers...
  • Miracles: Definitely. They'll most likely be instants.
  • Yeah, they sounded good at first, but I have gradually lost love for them...
  • The followers I mean...
  • Oh, by the way, we could use the miracle mechanic.
  • Do you agree with making it YOUR temple?
  • How do you mean?
    (Sorry for the pause, I was in a huge duel with my brother.)
  • Your good.
    I mean that you are a god, so what is YOUR temple like? So the player kind of chooses what kind of temple they have, beyond just choosing the card. Like having a customizable card.
  • No, I don't think you get what I mean. Each part of the world will have a certain god, and when you play with the colors that the creatures are, you act as their god. Of course, there is only one actual god on the plane, who I will make.

  • Is this art to risque for the lieutenants? 

  • This is just an idea for the green white lieutenant. Like it?
    @The-DM
     
  • Interesting... Yes, I will use that idea!
  • Also, no, it looks fine to me.
  • Oh, sorry. I meant blue and white...

    (Whoops. Sorry.)
  • Satyr Warbringer

    Could change it to berserker, would that be better?
  • That's a really cool concept @joemamajoe!

  • edited May 2020
    Hmm... It would most likely be Gruul colors, honestly. Fey (according to Guildmaster's Guide to Ravnica, the Monster Manual, and the Player's Handbook, all used in D&D, Elves, centaurs and satyrs are fey) and plant-folk are only native to the forest in this realm. (The forest's colors are Gruul representing the wilderness, Simic representing their magic in the place, and Izzet representing their somewhat chaotic magic.) Making it a berserker would definitely make it Gruul colors, too, @joemamajoe . Additionally, you got the frame wrong. It's supposed to be red/white/gold, not red/white/hybrid. Also, the mana is strange for Boros colors, and a few others as well. I honestly don't know why (To find out the correct way the mana is placed, just look at the frame when you are viewing it). But really cool concept. I'll take it into account! Could you send me the art you used?
  • I just want to point out that the traditional spelling of Fey is Fae. And Faerie.
  • In MTG, of course, but in D&D, they spell it F-E-Y, but no matter.
  • Oh, fae is actually derived from nordic I believe.
This discussion has been closed.