The art wouldn't work with M15 frame for some reason and the modern frame freaked out when I tried to use italics so to Despair X you Discard X cards and lose life equal to their converted mana cost.
@michaelmvm - Just as infect replaces how you deal damage, while still counting as dealing damage, cache replaces how you draw while still counting as a draw. For this reason, the rules text intentionally replaces a draw with a different "draw" and not with "put that card into your hand"
I'll put the concept of the challenge again: The challenge is to make a wording that can be replaced with a verb, and make a card that uses that verb in the effect. That verb is called keyword action.
Some of the non-evergreen keyword actions Wizards printed : Scry, Fateseal, Proliferate, Transform, Detain, Populate, Monstrosity, Vote, Bolster, Manifest Please check out how they are written on cards!
You know, I thought I'd make a serious one for you. You don't need to include this in the challenge. (Also limited for space so it is a little simplified.) Slive the Evacuator http://mtgcardsmith.com/view/slive-the-evacuator?list=user
@seaspray4TF3 That's a very creative and intriguing design. However, as a requirement of this challenge, reminder text must be italicized. I'm sorry, your card isn't included in this challenge.
@stormbreath Bro, pay attention. Keyword actions have been explained in varying levels of detail at least six times now. AT LEAST. That is an ability. Here we go (again): An action is something a player does (such as destroying). So purge could be written like this: {2}: Purge target creature if its combined power and toughness is less than this one's. (To purge, put a card from the battlefield directly into its owner's graveyard.)
@CrucibleOfHate@Tomigon This is just the greatest challenge, so many mistakes. The real challenge is getting people to understand the challenge itself. I feel like anyone who has made an actual keyword action has already won, haha.
Vengeance - Each creature card you exile from your graveyard while casting this spell pays for 1.
- This is really just a more defined Delve, where instead you are restricted to exiling creature cards, so you don't have to face an opponent spamming sorceries and instants to delve for an insane amount. [ Man, I hate it when mana symbols start a new line, especially when that's the only damn thing on the line. ] This is more of a WB keyword instead of the Sultai wedge for delve, in my opinion, but then again, when is a single opinion important?
Keyword Action - Bequeath Bequeath {cost} ({cost}:Target player gains control of this creature. Bequeath only as a sorcery.) Similar to Equip in that it can only be used on your turn Example Bog Bride http://mtgcardsmith.com/view/bog-bride
@Corwinnn Tell me your joking! TELL ME THIS IS A JOKE! I had faith in you, Corwinnn! About the keyword being an ability, of course. I don't care about the name change. That is not an action. Giving the player control was the action. Equip is an activated ability. It tells you to attach when you activate it. The attach is the action. So technically you made a keyword action, but you confused the issue, and the reminder text is wrong for what you tried to do.
I had an idea. I HAD AN IDEA
Any keyword action reminder text should be read as "To {ACTION}, (what you do)". If it can't be written like that, IT ISN'T AN ACTION. If it has a target, IT ISN'T AN ACTION. If you put a cost on the action, IT IS AN ABILITY. END. OF. STORY.
So, don't put the word and a cost. Put the cost, then the word. Simply put, as I've done for every other incorrect entry I've seen: {B}: Bequeath Bog Bride. Activate this ability only as a sorcery. (To bequeath, have another player gain control of this permanent.) {B}: Bequeath Bog Bride to target player. Activate this ability only as a sorcery.(That player gains control of this permanent.)
This time I did two, for even more demonstration purposes.
Technically speaking, bequeath would be a substitute for "gain control of", so even this is a stretch, but only because it's unprecedented, not because it's inaccurate.
Comments
The art wouldn't work with M15 frame for some reason and the modern frame freaked out when I tried to use italics so to Despair X you Discard X cards and lose life equal to their converted mana cost.
http://mtgcardsmith.com/view/fearful-asymmetry
Really cool ability! But yeah, michaelmvm is right. It's not a keyword action. Hahaha!
http://mtgcardsmith.com/view/devils-feast
http://mtgcardsmith.com/view/fiery-grasp
Yours are keyword abilities. Not keyword actions
I'll put the concept of the challenge again:
The challenge is to make a wording that can be replaced with a verb, and make a card that uses that verb in the effect. That verb is called keyword action.
Some of the non-evergreen keyword actions Wizards printed :
Scry, Fateseal, Proliferate, Transform, Detain, Populate, Monstrosity, Vote, Bolster, Manifest
Please check out how they are written on cards!
And gamepedia is also helpful : http://mtgsalvation.gamepedia.com/Keyword_action
Slive the Evacuator
http://mtgcardsmith.com/view/slive-the-evacuator?list=user
Gaea's Confidant
http://mtgcardsmith.com/view/aurok-sentinel
Here we go (again): An action is something a player does (such as destroying). So purge could be written like this:
{2}: Purge target creature if its combined power and toughness is less than this one's. (To purge, put a card from the battlefield directly into its owner's graveyard.)
http://mtgcardsmith.com/view/edge-of-desolation
Vengeance - Each creature card you exile from your graveyard while casting this spell pays for 1.
- This is really just a more defined Delve, where instead you are restricted to exiling creature cards, so you don't have to face an opponent spamming sorceries and instants to delve for an insane amount. [ Man, I hate it when mana symbols start a new line, especially when that's the only damn thing on the line. ] This is more of a WB keyword instead of the Sultai wedge for delve, in my opinion, but then again, when is a single opinion important?
Hey guys, guys! I came up with the perfect new keyword ability, it's called Inconceivable
http://mtgcardsmith.com/view/i-dont-think-you-know
http://mtgcardsmith.com/view/aurok-sentinel-1 (ps. I couldn't find a way to remove the first draft, so seek this out.)
It doesn't notify me unless you use my actual Username.
http://mtgcardsmith.com/view/i-dont-think-you-know
@stormbreath It is a keyword action! But your card can be fixed so that it looks more prettier. I commented on your card, so please check out.
Bequeath {cost} ({cost}:Target player gains control of this creature. Bequeath only as a sorcery.)
Similar to Equip in that it can only be used on your turn
Example
Bog Bride
http://mtgcardsmith.com/view/bog-bride
That is not an action. Giving the player control was the action. Equip is an activated ability. It tells you to attach when you activate it. The attach is the action. So technically you made a keyword action, but you confused the issue, and the reminder text is wrong for what you tried to do.
I had an idea.
I HAD AN IDEA
Any keyword action reminder text should be read as "To {ACTION}, (what you do)".
If it can't be written like that, IT ISN'T AN ACTION.
If it has a target, IT ISN'T AN ACTION.
If you put a cost on the action, IT IS AN ABILITY.
END. OF. STORY.
So, don't put the word and a cost. Put the cost, then the word. Simply put, as I've done for every other incorrect entry I've seen:
{B}: Bequeath Bog Bride. Activate this ability only as a sorcery. (To bequeath, have another player gain control of this permanent.)
{B}: Bequeath Bog Bride to target player. Activate this ability only as a sorcery.(That player gains control of this permanent.)
This time I did two, for even more demonstration purposes.
Technically speaking, bequeath would be a substitute for "gain control of", so even this is a stretch, but only because it's unprecedented, not because it's inaccurate.