Raise the Past is going to be an entry of mine, final version pending, ignore previous entry version. Unless DQ'ed in comment section I wont know which cards you refer to for contests. Errata that makes it functional but not change the function appreciated if applicable.
@Kkarn I always use the most recent entry. I'll add that to my rules next time. People remake a lot for these contests, so that's going to be how it works from here on out.
NEW RULE: You can remake entries an indefinite amount of times, as long as you link the most recent version here every time. If you want to avoid spamming, post your entries as a set, and add the remakes to the set and remove the old version.
I tried A LOT of different wordings, but that's basically the only one that would fit and still follows most of wording rules. I even had to shorten the name Hope this still qualifies as "additional cost".
Although an independent entry, it was highly inspired by KKarn's "Raise the Past", so unless @Grimshac feels it's far enough removed not to be considered plagiarism, I'd be happy to share the prize with KKarn as a joint collaborative entry, since we brainstormed quite a bit together, and shared ideas.
However, I think KKarn will also like to enter his own variation, using some of my ideas / suggestions / technical insights, and I'm not expecting any reward should he win.
Not having heard from KKarn after mentioning my intentions, I'm guessing he's okay with it, and this is where I currently stand.
Comments
BUMP
http://mtgcardsmith.com/view/lands-wrath
Because it's never good enough.
NEW RULE: You can remake entries an indefinite amount of times, as long as you link the most recent version here every time. If you want to avoid spamming, post your entries as a set, and add the remakes to the set and remove the old version.
http://mtgcardsmith.com/view/gaeas-ultimatum
Because Izzet needs more shenanigans :P
http://mtgcardsmith.com/view/viking-expedition?list=user
Thank you for entering, I will check the entry soon.
No rule, I misread when your card was made (Read 2015, not 2016) hence why I edited my response. My mistake.
here's my new version:
http://mtgcardsmith.com/view/horrid-transmuter
I tried A LOT of different wordings, but that's basically the only one that would fit and still follows most of wording rules. I even had to shorten the name Hope this still qualifies as "additional cost".
100%. That's exactly the kind of thing I had in mind, among other things.
thank you for your entry.
http://mtgcardsmith.com/view/reaper-from-astrakil
Thank you for your entry. I commented on it briefly.
My new 2nd entry:
http://mtgcardsmith.com/view/ooze-of-forms
(1st entry is still this: http://mtgcardsmith.com/view/angelic-aid?list=user)
Sorry for unintentional spam...
No worries, free bumps. I also commented on your card.
http://mtgcardsmith.com/view/dimir-summons
Although an independent entry, it was highly inspired by KKarn's "Raise the Past", so unless @Grimshac feels it's far enough removed not to be considered plagiarism, I'd be happy to share the prize with KKarn as a joint collaborative entry, since we brainstormed quite a bit together, and shared ideas.
However, I think KKarn will also like to enter his own variation, using some of my ideas / suggestions / technical insights, and I'm not expecting any reward should he win.
Not having heard from KKarn after mentioning my intentions, I'm guessing he's okay with it, and this is where I currently stand.
* Edit - Changed the name.
http://mtgcardsmith.com/view/navar-atal-dark-sorcerer
http://mtgcardsmith.com/view/guise?list=user
http://mtgcardsmith.com/view/death-duelist