Topic Closed

edited June 2016 in Off-topic Chat
thanks for turning out.

Comments

  • edited June 2016
    Personally, I'm not one to judge cards, but maybe this will help.

    I like the idea of your cards. But some things need a lot of work. Let's work on this card:
    http://mtgcardsmith.com/view/ardos-hell-executioner?list=user

    First tip: Don't be afraid to capitalize. I do it all the time (Mainly with school essays). So, instead of "Ardos hell executioner", do "Ardos, Hell's Executioner"

    Now, you have the right idea for Legendary Creature, but the subtype seems slightly off to me. So, you have his race (Giant), but nothing else. Plus, I think a demon would be in charge of executing. So, I think the subtype should be changed to Demon Warrior.

    For the mechanics, I would say to scrap Deathtouch and Flash, unless you were going for a Grixis card (Blue, Black, and Red). Also, crank the Double strike down to First strike.

    So, now let's work on the activated abilities. Here is the original:

    {x}{t}: destroy X plains permanents.
    {t} target opponent exiles all instants in their library.
    {t}{r} target opponent exiles all sorcery in their library.

    As I said, capitalization matters. Some of these abilities are crazy OP. So, after tampering with them for a bit, this is what I got:

    {x}{x},{t}: Target opponent sacrifices X plains permanents.
    {t}, Pay 1 life: Search target opponent's library for up to three instant or sorcery spells. Exile them.

    So, this was just a few suggestions on what to do. If you have any questions, just tag me on this discussion (Tag me with @GodFerretGaming) and I should be right over.
  • thanks for the tips but some of them i highly disagree sorry
  • edited June 2016
    My first suggestion would be to take a look at your wording of effects and abilities. Even if you're doing something that has never been done before in MTG, there will always be sources that do something somewhat similar on existing real cards that you can use to make your card's wording more understandable and standardized.

    For example, your card "Temple of eternal solitude" has a lot of wording and formatting mistakes.
    image

    It is:
    as Temple of eternal solitude enters the battlefield, scry 5. if mana would be produced, triple your mana even if tapped. {t} add {b}{b}{b}{b} to your mana pool. {t}{b}{x} put X X/X black demon creature tokens onto the battlefield with flying and deathtouch.

    It should be:
    When Temple of Eternal Solitude enters the battlefield, scry 5. Whenever enchanted land is tapped for mana, its controller adds two mana of the color it produced to his or her mana pool. {t}: Add {b}{b}{b} to your mana pool. {x}{b}, {t}: Put X X/X black Demon creature tokens with flying and deathtouch onto the battlefield under your control.

    That being said, this card is... Not... Good... I'm just going to list a few reasons off the top of my head:
    1) You didn't capitalize the other adjectives/nouns/verbs in the name
    2) It can't be cast (it has no casting cost)
    3) It is a Legendary Enchant Land with a subtype of 'land'. This doesn't mean anything. It is not a land.
    4) There isn't much scry in black unless you're doing something else and paying life or saccing for it, like in Read the Bones or Viscera Seer.
    5) Scry 5 is insane. The only card in the entirety of MTG that lets you scry 5 is Nissa's Revelation and it costs 7cmc.
    6) Nothing triples mana production, not even in green. Black certainly doesn't do it and if it did it would probably cost you a literal arm and a leg.
    7) You don't tap enchantments to trigger their abilities.
    8) Nothing should be able to produce {b}{b}{b}{b} each turn by tapping. That is too much mana.
    9) Things that attach to other things (equipment, enchantments, etc) don't tap to do things. The thing they are attached to do.
    10) The last ability... Just... sigh It is so overpowered that when I read it the first time it caused me physical pain in my chest.
    11) Any individual ability this has should have a cost ranging from 8cmc in black to infinite. All of them combined is so far beyond overpowered even Foegod would look at it and be, like, "Woah, hold on there buddy."

    TL;DR: Every single thing in this card is wrong. There are no suggestions I can make because I can't even tell what you intended this to be in the context of a real game of Magic. The only way any of this would make sense is if this card was made for a different yet eerily similar game and I somehow missed that.

    Should I take a look at some more of your cards?
  • Sure I'll give some feedback!

    Valley of the Hidden
    http://mtgcardsmith.com/view/valley-of-the-hidden?list=user

    a) hidden needs to be capitalized

    b) there needs to be a colon after the tap ability

    c) the a needs to be capitalized in "Add b/r to your mana pool

    d) the second is ability is too over-powered. 6 mana for free is insane. An OP card in MTG costs 1 mana and adds only 3 mana to your mana pool

    e) again, the first ability is too over-powered. Usually it would be add black OR red to your mana pool, not both. Since it doesn't enter tapped an does nothing bad to you, that ability is too OP

    f) there needs to be space between each ability

    g) space after the word "add"

    h) the letter s needs to capitalized in the word "Sacrifice"

    i) there should be a comma before the sacrifice ability

    j) after the sacrifice ability there should be a colon instead of a comma


    I think you need to do more research before making your cards.
  • Killer Croc

    http://mtgcardsmith.com/view/killer-croc-12?list=user

    a) the mana cost is backwards

    b) the beginning of each sentence needs to be capitalized

    c) all planeswalkers have a name (e.g., Jace, Liliana, Ajani), and the subtype needs to be that name. The card's name needs to include that subtype name (e.g., Ajani Steadfast, Ajani, Mentor of Heroes)

    d) the second ability shouldn't be a +3

    Again, more research and effort needs to be put into your cards

  • Also @D3ADMAN I would listen to @GodFerretGaming. I find it odd that you disagree to his suggestions because

    a) you said you wanted feedback

    b) his suggestions really can't be wrong, they are used in real MTG cards by WoTC
  • ok thank all of you guys for the feedback but you must understand im new here and im not gonna be all 100% and nerdy to the point my cards are like others cause there not. there mine! so quit picking on me
  • @d3adman You asked for comments. Did you only want positive comments? You shouldn't ask for comments and then fight with people who give you comments.

    This is also a custom Magic: The Gathering card forum. If you're here, you're 100% nerdy.
  • 110% prolly
  • @strongbelieves hahahahahahahhaha
  • @d3adman I think the point of MTG Cardsmith is to make your cards as realistic or as funny as possible. I personally would welcome the feedback and take it as a chance to improve my skills.
  • @LukeMTG i do its just some are pointless. my new cards are realisitic and no the point of this site is to have fun not be mean but man havent you got better things to do than lecture me? i made this forum to get people to view my cards and at the time i was bored but i dont think ill be doing it again cause everyone is very harsh to newbies especially @LukeMTG
  • @D3ADMAN Part of the situation of this site is that it's commonly agreed that cards are designed to be realistic unless they are Un-Cards. Those who commented are likely not doing it to be harsh jackholes, but rather because they are attempting to help you reach this epitome of realisticness for your cards. Being on my fourth month here, I can say that this site is not harsh to newbies. Those who give criticisms are simply being honest.
  • edited June 2016
    @D3adman, we tried to help you. I went down to the roots of ONE CARD for you. If you don't appreciate our help, and diss people like this, your not going to make any friends on here.

    @LukeMTG, if someone suggests me for help on cards, I'm scared. XD
  • edited June 2016
    just leave me alone
  • I guess we can close this now.
This discussion has been closed.