MTG Cardsmith Community Forums
Post your cards here, see what others think
This discussion has been closed.
Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Comments
How's this? It's made for conspiracy draft: http://mtgcardsmith.com/view/usurp-the-throne
Can someone review this please?
How are these:
http://mtgcardsmith.com/view/lands-of-gain
http://mtgcardsmith.com/view/spring-of-life-2
The first one is nice, I always thought it would be cool to build a "Love thy enemy" deck, where you're just super courteous, plus if they don't have a spell they can cast, mana burn!
The second one is a bit unbalanced in your opponent's favour, gaining 30 life is massive. And the mana spending restrictions mean that would have to be pretty much your only land. But it would work wonderfully in a mill deck, or some other alternate win condition deck, like tree of perdition, triskaidekaphobia.
http://mtgcardsmith.com/view/sanctum-of-the-archmagus?list=user
http://mtgcardsmith.com/view/perilous-way?list=user
@KrazyKobold98, Sanctum of the Archmagus looks overcosted, but this is an interesting idea...
Perilous Way just seems too OP. An extra Artifact vs a sacrificed card. Put it onto an Artifact sacrifice deck and it's so OP.
@Faiths_Guide,
Looks like you already got your feedback...
@Feyamius,
I can see this as too OP. But then again, it's only your hand. It seems more Bant to me... But it's still a really nice idea! I love it!
You're probably right, Bant sounds like a good idea. Maybe I'll redo it eventually.
On your card: Why do you write "indestructible" with a small i? Or, other way around, why do you write the other keywords with a capital (but I get that, I like it more this way too)? I'm not sure about the wording, if that's correct the way you did it. Maybe in the first ability "put up to X tokens" and in the second "for each token you put onto the battlefield less than X you may choose one" and in addition "you may chose more than one for each additional token less than X". But maybe with that wording, it's not enough space in the rule text box.
As for your card, Summoned Obedience, what an interesting idea! There are so many different ways you could play this. It's definitely not as good early game as it could be late game, but starting at 5 mana or so, you can get a lot of combinations out of this! My only gripe with it is that whatever effect you get, there's probably another spell that does (more or less) the same thing, but at a lower cost. But I guess that's the price of versatility!
http://mtgcardsmith.com/view/eliza-knife-of-the-shadow-1
http://mtgcardsmith.com/view/uncontested-champion-1
http://mtgcardsmith.com/view/time-10
Here's my "Fundamental Disruption" vertical cycle - three cards that lay down what the Disrupt ability word is all about.
http://mtgcardsmith.com/view/luz-the-equilibrium
The thing I'm struggling most is whether or not the last ability is actually doing what I'm trying to accomplish. It's supposed to be like she gets first strike and deathtouch so she'll kill that creature before it gets the chance to kill her, but I still don't really understand how first strike and deathtouch work together
Waaaaaay to overpowered.
First, a 2/2 with Renown 2 for 3 mana is already an uncommon.
Skulk adds it to a extremely powerful rare, because they combo slightly.
Then, with its third ability, it's pretty much pay {w}{b}. Destroy the creature blocking it."
Way past a mythic.
It sounds reasonable, however I personally just thought of it as a really good mythic.
Also, I believe you forgot to take note of the fact that there is a 2/3 with renown 2 and vigilance that's an uncommon. So I think the vigilance for skulk is a worthy payoff including the extra 1 defense so that they all would even things out. Then I envision that the third ability is what makes it even up there to mythic plus it's a legendary creature so you can only have one whereas you can have four of the 2/3 renown 2 and vigilance.
I think if it was a 2/2 for 3 mana with skulk and renown 2 wouldn't constitute a rare. But thanks for the input!
Simple but cool
http://mtgcardsmith.com/view/runo-stromkirk-1?list=user
Falkenrath vs stromkirk
On Runo Stormkirk, do I need to say? I think you already understand.
On Anje Falkenrath, it feels very underpowered. It's very weak, a vampires are not often cast for their madness cost. Plus, a planeswalker is a player.
Now how about checking this out - The new Sensei's Diving top: http://mtgcardsmith.com/view/divergent-clashings