@sanjaya666 What? I don't remember your previous entry but I also don't remember saying any entry was stupid O_o Please don't take my comments too harshly, they're just a personal opinion meant to pinpoint what I think could be improved, but I don't want to offend you. If you're uncomfortable with me giving feedback on your cards I can totally refrain, really I don't mean to make anyone feel bad
@sanjaya666, Most people on the site (especially ningyounk) are genuinely trying to help when they provide criticism or any other kind of constructive comment. The recipients of such assistance need to make sure they don't overreact if they find the comment not to their liking. Even more importantly, they mustn't report that the person in question said things they didn't. Doesn't always feel good to find out you made mistakes with a design (I do it all the time), but help with pointing out these mistakes should never be scorned.
@ningyounk I wasn't angry or whatever it was towards you. I only said that my card was stupid because it was really stupid and you just pointed it out. I wasn't offended anyway. It's even nice when people can give me feedback.
I wasn't sure how well this would go, but there are a lot more good cards than I thought we would get. That makes it more difficult to judge, but it's always a good problem to have!
Honorable Mentions... @Faiths_Guide @KJMartin @kimandbech @Flatfish Your cards were on the cusp of making the top three, but the final three just managed to edge yours out. You made this difficult for some of our up and coming Cardsmiths to crack the top.
First Place - Prishna, Advocate of Akrasa by @Animist http://mtgcardsmith.com/view/prishna-advocate-of-akrasa This one feels, to me, like a top to bottom Bant Aristocrat, without being overworked. The art and flavor really work well with the abilities! Great job!!
Comments
I'm sure it wasn't any fault of yours.
@sanjaya666,
Most people on the site (especially ningyounk) are genuinely trying to help when they provide criticism or any other kind of constructive comment. The recipients of such assistance need to make sure they don't overreact if they find the comment not to their liking. Even more importantly, they mustn't report that the person in question said things they didn't. Doesn't always feel good to find out you made mistakes with a design (I do it all the time), but help with pointing out these mistakes should never be scorned.
I wasn't angry or whatever it was towards you. I only said that my card was stupid because it was really stupid and you just pointed it out. I wasn't offended anyway. It's even nice when people can give me feedback.
@Faiths_Guide
Okay baws.
Cool, not pointing fingers. *thumbsup*
Glad that no anger was harbored.
Changed my entry.
XD
Make her a Human Scout Advisor?
Special Thanks...
@sanjaya666
@HenryTheHatter
@hivelord3
@Sweepea38
@Inzeen
@Rubieus
Thank you for the entries! Some tough competitors kept you from getting to the top, but there are some really fun entries in here! Great work!
Honorable Mentions...
@Faiths_Guide
@KJMartin
@kimandbech
@Flatfish
Your cards were on the cusp of making the top three, but the final three just managed to edge yours out. You made this difficult for some of our up and coming Cardsmiths to crack the top.
Top Three...
Third Place - Goldleaf Storyteller by @ningyounk
http://mtgcardsmith.com/view/goldleaf-storyteller-2
Really great art and cool ability! This is a card I would love to see expanded on and a mechanic I would love to explore! Great Work!
Second Place - Bant Aristocrat by @AustinSmith
http://mtgcardsmith.com/view/bant-aristocrat
I appreciate the nod to the original Aristocrat challenges, and I like where you took this with the Artwork and the abilities!
First Place - Prishna, Advocate of Akrasa by @Animist
http://mtgcardsmith.com/view/prishna-advocate-of-akrasa
This one feels, to me, like a top to bottom Bant Aristocrat, without being overworked. The art and flavor really work well with the abilities! Great job!!
Coming Soon -
-Trophy-
Hall of Fame - http://forums.mtgcardsmith.com/discussion/comment/68748/#Comment_68748