@TenebrisNemo Bushido stacks, so you can just write it as follows. (Bushido and Dreadful are also a noncombo!) ----- Other creatures you control have Bushido 1. -----
Although, I feel the creature itself is too low impact. Aside from that, Asura needs an explanation in a card's flavor text.
@modnation675 Would something like this work: "You may cast Ayres, the Transient Soul as a copy of another creature you control for that creature's casting cost only if that creature is green and/or blue and has no other colors."
I was thinking that the "has no other colors" would work considering your options are green, blue, green/blue, and each combination would be subject to the no other colors clause
@RohanDragoon Thanks for the feedback, I tested the wording. Although, I think I'll wait until I find out a shorthand version. Otherwise, I'll leave it as is.
I'm keeping a copy of it in the case that I change stances. (In the case, I determine it's unbalanced!)
@Gelectrode The Trickster creature type is a hybrid of other types. It's used for creatures with game changing effects and effects that normally are seen on more costly cards.
This is my Memories cycle for Zendikar's rebirth. Red might be too powerful as it involves land destruction, and black should force sacrifice, but I think they're fine otherwise. What do you guys think?
I agree that the mutual benefit cards seem far more fun than the mutual loss. Do you have ideas on how to make similar things for blue and red? I could have black regenerate a creature you don't control and regenerate two creatures you control--Memories of Endurance, I could call it.
@NokiSkaur If you want to use regenerate, go for it, but just letting you know they use indestructible until end of turn now. Also, blue could be card draw; not sure on red.
Yeah, that would work. However, it wouldn't quite fit the full cycle if one of them had a full team effect in my opinion. It would just have to be the 2-1 creature buff. +2/+0 and first strike sounds good, though.
@sanjaya666 For one, it should be discard a card and pay 1 life. Two, do you mean instant or sorcery? Also, if you want a really interesting dynamic, have her have a higher power and toughness, but replace the lifeloss with putting a -1/-1 counter on her. It would make for a much more interesting ability.
Comments
Did you want it to be 'You may have that player create' or 'That player creates.' It looks like you've got both at the same time right now...
Posted feedback on the card page.
New version:
https://mtgcardsmith.com/view/eldrak-vicar-of-vermin
Other than that, it's good!
Here is a card I made recently. Wondering if Asura would be a good creature type.
Bushido stacks, so you can just write it as follows. (Bushido and Dreadful are also a noncombo!)
-----
Other creatures you control have Bushido 1.
-----
Although, I feel the creature itself is too low impact. Aside from that, Asura needs an explanation in a card's flavor text.
That card was a little test. I may create some new Asuras soon with some nice flavor text.
Cool, I'm interested to see your interpretation of Asura. I'm not familiar with the term aside from knowing the game Asura's Wrath.
https://mtgcardsmith.com/view/the-outsider
Would something like this work:
"You may cast Ayres, the Transient Soul as a copy of another creature you control for that creature's casting cost only if that creature is green and/or blue and has no other colors."
I was thinking that the "has no other colors" would work considering your options are green, blue, green/blue, and each combination would be subject to the no other colors clause
Thanks for the feedback, I tested the wording. Although, I think I'll wait until I find out a shorthand version. Otherwise, I'll leave it as is.
I'm keeping a copy of it in the case that I change stances. (In the case, I determine it's unbalanced!)
My only inquiry is concerning the creature type. Why trickster? Wouldn't shapeshifter be better? Or at least Rogue?
Thoughts?
https://mtgcardsmith.com/view/grave-butcher
The Trickster creature type is a hybrid of other types. It's used for creatures with game changing effects and effects that normally are seen on more costly cards.
@Faiths_Guide, that's a pretty powerful card! Though Deathtouch is pretty weird with Menace...
Thoughts?
https://mtgcardsmith.com/view/merchantile-empire
No problem, we've been slow on entries which is lagging the contest a bit. (Darn art-block!)
I'll be leaving feedback on your card's page as well.
https://mtgcardsmith.com/view/memories-of-unity?list=set&set=23094
https://mtgcardsmith.com/view/memories-of-knowledge?list=set&set=23094
https://mtgcardsmith.com/view/memories-of-endurance?list=set&set=23094
https://mtgcardsmith.com/view/memories-of-war?list=set&set=23094
https://mtgcardsmith.com/view/memories-of-beauty?list=set&set=23094
I agree that the mutual benefit cards seem far more fun than the mutual loss. Do you have ideas on how to make similar things for blue and red? I could have black regenerate a creature you don't control and regenerate two creatures you control--Memories of Endurance, I could call it.
Black: Memories of Endurance--Temporary indestructible
Blue: Memories of Knowledge(?)--Mutual card draw
Red: Memories of War--Temporary team pump
Would that work?
Yeah, that would work. However, it wouldn't quite fit the full cycle if one of them had a full team effect in my opinion. It would just have to be the 2-1 creature buff. +2/+0 and first strike sounds good, though.
I know--I fixed it.
Commented.