Iridian, the Omenslayer 20 β 12 Shareth, Uniter of Worlds
Iridian is a near-perfect mythic dragon: powerful, flavorful, build-around, and balanced. Shareth is fascinating and potentially brilliant in casual Commander groups who like puzzles β but as printed, itβs too rules-vague and swingy to compete cleanly.
@StuffnSuch - I can't figure out why you're duplicated. I see it on the admin side, too, but when I delete and re-add you, it always creates 2 of you lol
GG @Mellow_MC! I will accept your rematch. It should be possible for you because you're just 3 ranks below me. Generally, because the league is relative small at the moment, everybody should be able to challenge anybody.
Just curious, you mentioned in your notes each time that there were potential rules issues, which I've tried to figure out what you mean, but it seems to actually work perfectly as far as I can tell. I must be missing something, so I'd appreciate you filling me in on what rules concern is catching your eye.
@StuffnSuch maybe he means that it's not clear if they all have to be in the same zone or if they just need to be in any zone. If you mean the secondary option you would win instantly as soon as your first turn starts since Shareth is in the command zone and all other cards are in the in your hand and your library, which are also zones.
MTG Cardsmith Community Forums
Comments
@Mellow_MC vs @StuffnSuch
Iridian, the Omenslayer by Mellow_MC | MTG Cardsmith vs Shareth, Uniter of Worlds by StuffnSuch | MTG Cardsmithπ― Final Score
Iridian, the Omenslayer 20 β 12 Shareth, Uniter of Worlds
Iridian is a near-perfect mythic dragon: powerful, flavorful, build-around, and balanced. Shareth is fascinating and potentially brilliant in casual Commander groups who like puzzles β but as printed, itβs too rules-vague and swingy to compete cleanly.
@StuffnSuch - I can't figure out why you're duplicated. I see it on the admin side, too, but when I delete and re-add you, it always creates 2 of you lol
@FireOfGolden vs @Corwinnn
Phased in Time by FireOfGolden | MTG Cardsmith vs Klik-Nak-Nik by Corwinnn | MTG Cardsmithπ― Final Score
Phased in Time 20 β 17 Klik-Nak-Nik
Phased in Time is mechanically cleaner, highly innovative, and perfect for control players.
Klik-Nak-Nik is flavorful and ambitious, but needs templating help to fully realize its great idea.
Jump into Darkness by Lurisauri | MTG Cardsmith vs Water Wyrm by Mellow_MC | MTG Cardsmith@Lurisauri vs @Mellow_MC
π― Final Score
Jump into Darkness 20 β 10 Water Wyrm
Jump into Darkness is clear, well-costed, and would fit easily in any standard-legal set.
Water Wyrm is unique but confusing, both mechanically and flavorfully, especially for a green card.
By the way, thanks, @Corwinnn! You put up a good fight!
https://mtgcardsmith.com/view/run-over-3
Just curious, you mentioned in your notes each time that there were potential rules issues, which I've tried to figure out what you mean, but it seems to actually work perfectly as far as I can tell. I must be missing something, so I'd appreciate you filling me in on what rules concern is catching your eye.
@FireOfGolden vs @Lurisauri
https://mtgcardsmith.com/view/jump-into-darkness vs https://mtgcardsmith.com/view/fading-stickwolfπ§ Final Score:
Fading Stickwolf 22 β 16 Jumping into Darkness
Fading Stickwolf is a masterclass in common design: unique mechanic, synergy, tension, and flavor.
Jumping into Darkness is effective but standard; it doesn't surprise or push boundaries.
I'd like to swap Tree Rat for https://mtgcardsmith.com/view/experiment-grows-its-mind (Because I just happened to realize adding new color to permanents with devoid doesn't override its effect)
Then challenge both @Corwinnn and @Lurisauri with Experiment Grows Its Mind